After her TV career, she sounds like an evangelist preaching a feminist substitute to replace religion in her monthly Oprah Magazine. Her August issue carries this motivational nugget of Oprah wisdom on the cover: It starts with choosing love -- in any form.
Abortion for social reasons is usually least acceptable to opponents. Birth control and disability Abortion as a substitute for contraception Some methods of contraception in fact amount to abortion during For abortion very earliest stage of a pregnancy.
This section only deals with abortion after the first week of pregnancy. Some societies have used abortion as a substitute for adequate provision of contraception, or quite deliberately to regulate population size.
Ina United Nations Conference on World Population in Belgrade said that abortion was the chief method of birth control in the world at that time. Most western supporters of abortion rights do not support abortions carried out for such reasons - or at least not as explicit public policy.
However some doctors do argue that abortion should be part of a country's contraception policy. They say that a society that believes that people should plan their families must allow women to end unwanted pregnancies, in order to deal with failures of birth control.
Abortion and disability Some ethicists dislike the argument that abortion should be allowed where the baby, if born, would suffer from physical or mental handicaps. They say that allowing this as a reason for abortion is offensive to disabled people; because it implies that they, and their lives, are less worthwhile than the lives of 'normal' people.
And some people with disabilities that could be put forward as grounds for abortion argue that they would much rather be alive than have been killed in the womb. Section 1 1 d of the UK's Abortion Act allowed termination of a pregnancy at any time if there was a significant risk of the baby being born seriously disabled.
Under other circumstances abortion has to take place during the first 6 months of the pregnancy. The Disability Rights Commission criticised this section in the following words: The Section is offensive to many people; it reinforces negative stereotypes of disability and there is substantial support for the view that to permit terminations at any point during a pregnancy on the ground of risk of disability, while time limits apply to other grounds set out in the Abortion Act, is incompatible with valuing disability and non-disability equally.
In common with a wide range of disability and other organisations, the DRC believes the context in which parents choose whether to have a child should be one in which disability and non-disability are valued equally.
Disability Rights Commission Other ethicists argue that whether or not people with disabilities are upset by this argument is irrelevant.
They say that the argument is wrong because it attacks the principle that all human beings are equally valuable in their own ways. They say that it is just plain wrong to say that one life is less valuable than another.
Other, pro-life, campaigners have objected to this argument on the grounds that it permits eugenic abortion - abortion to eliminate disabling genes from the human race. Eugenics and gender selection Abortion and eugenics Abortion has been used in the past to stop the growth of population groups, or racial groups regarded as genetically 'inferior'.
This is now regarded as a most serious breach of human rights and a criminal act. Abortion has been used in the past to stop people with various genetic defects from having children.
When this is done as a matter of public policy it is now regarded as a most serious breach of human rights and a criminal act. Abortion and gender selection In some countries, particularly India there is a major problem with female foeticide - deliberately aborting foetuses that would be born as girls.
For sociological and economic reasons parents in some cultures prefer to have boy babies. When parents can discover the gender of the foetus in advance, they sometimes request the termination of a pregnancy solely because the foetus is female.
While selective abortion for gender preference is illegal in India, the low proportion of female births relative to male births, together with other evidence, makes it certain that female foeticide is practised on a large scale.Pro-choice Abortion - Consider the Health Risks of Abortion Pro-choice abortion is supported by Planned Parenthood, which is being sued for failure to provide information to patients of risks associated with having an abortion.
Human life is a sacred gift from God. Elective abortion for personal or social convenience is contrary to the will and the commandments of God. Church members who submit to, perform, encourage, pay for, or arrange for such abortions may lose their membership in the Church. However, abortion for the mother’s life and abortion for the mother’s health are usually not the same issue.
Since every abortion kills an innocent human being, it is morally abhorrent to use the rare cases when abortion is necessary to save the life of the mother as justification for the millions of on demand “convenience” abortions.
Abortion is the killing of a human being, which defies the word of God. The Bible does not draw a distinction between fetuses and babies: the Greek word brephos is used in the Bible to refer to both an unborn child and an infant. The first type of abortion is a medical abortion, and is usually administered within the first nine weeks of barnweddingvt.com type of abortion involves taking mifepristone and misoprostol tablets.
The majority of all abortions take place before 8 weeks of pregnancy. 1 Surgical Abortions. Abortion is in direct defiance of the commonly accepted idea of the sanctity of human life; No civilized society permits one human to intentionally harm or take the life of another human without punishment, and abortion is no different.
Adoption is a viable alternative to abortion and accomplishes the same result.