People were divided into groups of supporters and opponents of such practice. Both have strong and persuasive arguments. Here are several points for and against that legalizing. However, when one speaks about such kind of freedom, one rarely thinks about homosexuals.
Human beings will suit our definition of persons for now, but we will come back to this later. All persons are equal. This seems obvious to me. Now, I am aware of the overused objection to this, that is, that we are not equal in many ways. We are not all equally strong, or equally Marriage equality persuasive essay, or capable of doing an equal amount of work, or equally beautiful, etc.
And we certainly all differ greatly in our personalities. Yes, indeed we do. I fail to see what this argument, if it is deserving of such a title, is attempting to establish.
Because people are different does not mean they are not equal. I do not recall saying all people were identical with one another.
No, people are not even identical with themselves over time. Equality is measured in terms of worth, of value. And all people have equal worth and equal value. There is no person who is inferior to any other person, ever. As Hobbes said in Leviathan, despite our physical differences, the smallest, weakest person could kill the strongest, so the physical differences argument is no basis for justifying inequality.
Let us consider an example: On the other we have a thug, a criminal, who has been convicted and has openly admitted to dozens of cases of murder, assault, rape, robbery, etc. Simply because we are not terribly fond of the actions of the second person does not mean they are of lesser intrinsic value.
This is obviously untrue. If you do not see this is untrue, there is probably no need for you to continue reading. I would like to think that if I was in a situation wherein I was able to save only the Queen or only the criminal let us call him Clemington I would not allow their positions in society affect my decision.
Or, if I were to allow it to affect my decision of who I should save, it would be in the opposite way from that which you may expect. Clemington perhaps is more deserving of life because he has had a bad life, and should be allowed more time to try to achieve happiness.
Of course, the committing of crimes does not make him unhappy, but living in jail for many years might do. What I am saying is: The Queen is a celebrity, and lives a very comfortable life.
As such, she has little left to want, whereas the criminal probably has a lot left to want. I would probably be quicker to save the life of an ordinary person than a rich celebrity any day. However, this is irrelevant to our present inquiry.
The point I wish to make is that all people are equal, regardless of who I would save first! This is indeed so, but will be discussed in a different essay.
Suffice it to say for now that it seems clear that if each person is equal to every other person, no one should be allowed to rule over others, or tell them what to do, and it is also clear that no one should possess vast fortunes while others starve. My proposed solutions for these problems will be discussed in another essay, but, having just considered equality, it is of obvious importance that we at least must realize that if everyone is equal, the society we live in must be changed drastically.
Where are we now? I think perhaps we may leave equality as an issue in and of itself, and consider how far this equality stretches.Marriage Equality Argumentative Essay by Kate Tyler Great strides have been made towards equal rights for homosexuals in the past century in Britain, making it hard to believe that Oscar Wilde - the famous author, poet and playwright - was sentenced to hard labour in prison in the s for his sexuality such a relatively short time ago.
Death, divorce, marriage, retirement, career changes, empty-nesting, moving Whether we instigate a stressful event or feel like the victim of one, navigating the transitional waters of change is hard.
Using the Bible to justify slavery.
Slavery in the Bible and early Christianity. Sponsored link. How the Bible was used to justify slavery. The Christian church's main justification of the concept of slavery is based on Genesis Nov 09, · Same-Sex Marriage Argumentative Essay 09 November by Both have strong and persuasive arguments.
If same-sex marriage is legalized, the world will be changed entirely; it can’t be argued. Here are several points for and against that legalizing. but that way all citizens will be able to leave in equality and placidity.
/5(K). Jul 12, · Gay marriage should be legalized because it is uncivilized and unmerited. Our civil rights and the Constitution give us many liberties.
One of our civil liberties is the pursuit of happiness. In , during the fourteenth year of their marriage, Eleanor Roosevelt, age thirty-three, discovered that Franklin, age thirty-six, was in love with her young social secretary, Lucy Mercer.
Long afterward, Eleanor told her friend Joseph Lash that the discovery was devastating, that the bottom seemed to have dropped out of her life.
Yet as her subsequent history persuasively testifies, it was.