When Kim Il-Jong recently visited Moscow on a surreal train journey, he proudly informed Vladimir Putin he was travelling in the armoured train given to his father as a present by Stalin.
Markus Nikolas HeinrichMar 9views This content was written by a student and assessed as part of a university degree. Iraq has been the focus of the international community and has been featured prominently in the media in recent times, as the radical Islamist group known as the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria ISIS has dramatically increased its power and influence in the region in the latter half of The political turmoil and drastically deteriorated security environment, which characterises modern day Iraq, can be traced back to the United States US invasion of that country and ISIS, which has recently emerged in Iraq and Syria, in the insurgency against the resultant US occupation, back then in the form of al-Qaeda in Iraq.
But why did the US invade and occupy Iraq in the first place? Likewise, the official and publically stated reasons for military action only go some way to explain the invasion, and one must look at the unofficial factors and goals which were determinants of equal importance.
The immediate considerations behind the invasion of Iraq were characterized by concerns brought to the forefront by the events of September 11thnamely global terrorism, and more importantly, the weapons at its disposal in a new era of transnational asymmetrical war waged by non-state actors.
As President George W. Bush made it clear in his State of the Union on January 29thin meeting this challenge, the US would not differentiate between terrorist groups and nations which harbour or arm them Bush, Iraq did not specifically harbour al-Qaeda, but it had provided training camps and other support to terrorist groups fighting the government of Turkey and Iran, as well as hard-line Palestinian groups.
However, the unofficial reasons why the US led the Invasion of Iraq in are equally important. The Bush administration hoped that removing Saddam Hussein would result in a domino effect, where all regimes in the greater Middle East hostile to the US and its interests in the region would be intimidated into cooperation, or toppled by their populations following the example the US had set freeing the Iraqi people Gauss III, To combat this threat, the US embarked on the global War on Terror, reassigning terrorism from a law enforcement issue to a military issue warranting aggressive counterattack.
This was due to the realisation that: Non-state and clandestinely state sponsored groups now [had] the ability and willingness to employ means of mass destruction [which] has dictated the recognition that States no longer [had] a monopoly on war.
Therefore, it [had] become appropriate to use war powers against foreign terrorist organizations Terwilliger, Although al-Qaeda was the prime target, any organisation deemed to be a terrorist organisation would also be targeted. During its third public hearing, it interviewed Judith S. She went on to say: Saddam used foreign terrorist groups as an instrument of foreign policy.
Groups hosted by Saddam were denied protection if he wanted to improve relations with a neighbouring country and encouraged to attack those Saddam wanted to pressure. However, there have also been a multitude of reports which state that there were no verified links between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda, and that he saw the group as a threat, not as an ally Katzman, Whether or not Saddam Hussein had links to al-Qaeda, he did have links to other terrorist groups which he tolerated on Iraqi soil and even trained, equipped, and supported.
According to the Council on Foreign Relations, they are: Iraq has also supported the Islamist Hamas movement and reportedly channelled money to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers Council on Foreign Relations, Israel, a staunch US ally also fighting terrorism, which in the view of many in the Bush administration was being sponsored and supported by Saddam Hussein, was no doubt also a consideration Weber, Its past links to terrorist organisations alone sufficed, but it was also suspected of possessing weapons of mass destruction and the ability to manufacture them.
The Iraqi regime has plotted to develop anthrax and nerve gas and nuclear weapons for over a decade. This is a regime that has already used poison gas to murder thousands of its own citizens, leaving the bodies of mothers huddled over their dead children.
This is a regime that agreed to international inspections then kicked out the inspectors. This is a regime that has something to hide from the civilized world Bush, It also demonstrated that these organisations had the will to cause as much death and destruction as possible and did not have any scruples about inflicting casualties on civilians or were prepared to follow rules of war accepted by most nation states to some degree or other.
It, therefore, followed that groups such as these would try to acquire weapons as destructive as possible, which in the modern world was no longer as difficult or unthinkable as it once was.
During the Cold War era, only nation states possessed the capability to inflict large scale damage, but in the post Cold War world, with the democratization of technology, small groups of people not bound to any specific state could inflict catastrophic damage Tschirgi, The emphasis, therefore, was no longer on these groups alone, but also on their possible sponsors.
At the top of this list were countries which had grievances with the United States, had links to terrorist organisations, were located in the Muslim Middle East, had WMD or the ability to manufacture them, and had used them in the past.
The one country which stood out more than most was Iraq.
On June 7thIsraeli warplanes launched a surprise attack on the French built Osirak nuclear reactor near Baghdad by claiming that Iraq was building a nuclear weapon which it could use against Israel Wright and Hopper, Iraq denied that the nuclear reactor was used for anything but peaceful purposes.
InIraq used chemical weapons in its war with Iran, which lasted from to WORLD WAR III IS COMING! Although there has been no major combat between the great powers since the Second World War, there are three key fronts emerging that make the prospect of a third global conflict alarmingly conceivable.
The prospect of a global conflict – World War III if you like – appears somewhat [ ]. JUST WAR AND IRAQ: I said below that I have yet to hear a satisfactory answer on why a quick war with Iraq would not be more just than the status quo of immiserating sanctions.
Now Glenn Reynolds links to a Michael Walzer essay on a war with Iraq that provides one response. The key grafs: "Defending the embargo, the American .
Yesterday I shared a brief passage from W.E.B. DuBois on Confederate barnweddingvt.com is an short essay from DuBois on Robert E. Lee’s legacy published in Source: The Crisis, March , v, n.3 [found in the “Postscript” section]. The American Empire. By Wade Frazier. Revised July Purpose and Disclaimer.
Timeline. Introduction. The New World Before “Discovery,” and the First Contacts. Digital Impact LLC produces large format, high-resolution, semi-permanent corrugated/mixed material POP & POS displays, product packaging and specialized permanent displays for companies of all backgrounds.
Our clients know us for our reliability, speed to market, and long-standing razor sharp focus on customer service. Utilizing state of the art digital printing, we produce product packaging. This essay delves deeply into the origins of the Vietnam War, critiques U.S.
justifications for intervention, examines the brutal conduct of the war, and discusses the antiwar movement, with a separate section on protest songs.